Skip to main content

Board Advisor vs Non-Executive Director: Understanding the Key Differences

Board meeting showing the difference between board advisors and non-executive directors in corporate governance

TL;DR - Key Points

  • Non-Executive Directors (NEDs) are formal board members with fiduciary duties and legal liabilities, while Board Advisors provide specialized guidance without the same legal responsibilities
  • The company board of directors has ultimate decision-making authority, whereas advisory boards provide advice and recommendations without formal governance power
  • NEDs contribute essential oversight and accountability for startups, while advisory board members offer flexible, specialized expertise for strategic decision-making
  • Choosing the right board role depends on your organisation's needs - NEDs for formal governance and accountability, advisors for targeted expertise and guidance

Board Advisor or Non-Executive Director: Understanding the Differences in Board Roles

Navigating the complexities of board roles can be challenging, especially when distinguishing between a Board Advisor and a Non-Executive Director (NED). Both play crucial roles in an organisation’s strategic direction, but their responsibilities, liabilities, and levels of involvement differ significantly in the context of board structure.

Understanding these differences is essential whether you’re a startup founder building your first board, a growing business seeking governance expertise, or an experienced professional considering a board role. This comprehensive guide will explore the key distinctions to help you determine which role best suits your organisation’s needs.

Defining the Roles: Non-Executive Directors vs. Board Advisors

Understanding the nuanced differences between Non-Executive Directors and Board Advisors is crucial for effective governance and strategic guidance. While both contribute to the success of an organisation, their roles and responsibilities diverge significantly, impacting their involvement, liability, and decision-making authority.

The core difference between a board and an advisory board revolves around formal authority and responsibilities.

What is a Non-Executive Director (NED)?

A Non-Executive Director (NED) is a board member of the company board who is not part of the executive team. The NED role is to provide independent oversight and constructive challenge to the executive directors and management team.

As members of the board of directors, NEDs:

  • Share responsibility for the company’s strategy, performance, and governance
  • Ensure the organisation is run effectively and in the best interests of shareholders
  • Hold fiduciary duties and legal liabilities as formal directors
  • Participate in board meetings with voting rights on key decisions
  • Are bound by the UK Corporate Governance Code for listed companies

A NED is a formal director with fiduciary duties, including the duty of care, duty of loyalty, and duty to act in good faith. This means NEDs can be held personally liable for board decisions and must act in accordance with company law.

Understanding the Role of a Board Advisor

A board advisor, or advisory board member, provides advice and guidance to the board of directors or the senior executive team. Unlike a non-executive director, an advisor is not a formal member of the main board and does not have the same legally responsible fiduciary duties or liabilities.

Board advisors typically:

  • Provide specialized expertise in specific areas (technology, marketing, finance, international expansion)
  • Offer strategic counsel without formal governance responsibilities
  • Attend meetings by invitation rather than as a matter of right
  • Have no voting rights on board decisions
  • Are not subject to the same regulatory requirements as NEDs

The role of the board advisor is to provide advice, leveraging their specific expertise and experience to support decision-making without bearing the same level of formal responsibility as a NED. This makes advisory positions more flexible and accessible for both organisations and advisors.

Key Differences Between NEDs and Advisors

The key difference between a board advisor and a non-executive director lies in their roles and responsibilities within the organisation:

Legal Status

  • Non-Executive Director (NED): Formal director with fiduciary duties
  • Board Advisor: Informal advisor without fiduciary duties

Liability

  • Non-Executive Director (NED): Personally liable for board decisions
  • Board Advisor: Limited liability (typically none)

Authority

  • Non-Executive Director (NED): Voting rights on board decisions
  • Board Advisor: No voting rights; advisory only

Governance

  • Non-Executive Director (NED): Subject to corporate governance codes
  • Board Advisor: Not subject to formal governance requirements

Appointment

  • Non-Executive Director (NED): Formal board appointment process
  • Board Advisor: Informal advisory agreement

Compensation

  • Non-Executive Director (NED): Director’s fees, often equity-based
  • Board Advisor: Consulting fees or equity (more flexible)

Time Commitment

  • Non-Executive Director (NED): Regular board meetings (typically 8-12/year)
  • Board Advisor: Flexible, as-needed engagement

Regulatory Oversight

  • Non-Executive Director (NED): Companies House registration required
  • Board Advisor: No registration required

When you are looking for non-executive directors, you seek individuals to actively participate in corporate governance with a clear understanding of the legal and fiduciary implications of their role.

For more information on how board-level expertise can transform your organisation, explore our Board Advisory services.

The Structure of Governance: Types of Boards

Overview of the Company Board

The company board is the cornerstone of corporate governance, comprising executive directors and non-executive directors who collectively oversee the organisation’s strategic direction and operational performance.

Board members are entrusted with fiduciary duties to act in the best interests of shareholders, ensuring transparency and accountability. According to the Institute of Directors, effective board composition typically includes:

  • Executive Directors: Day-to-day operational leaders (CEO, CFO, COO)
  • Non-Executive Directors: Independent oversight and strategic guidance
  • Independent Directors: NEDs with no material relationship with the company
  • Chair: Leads the board and ensures effective governance

Board appointments are critical decisions, as the board’s composition significantly impacts the company’s ability to navigate challenges and capitalize on opportunities. Research by McKinsey & Company shows that diverse boards with the right mix of skills and experience deliver superior financial performance.

A well-structured company board with the appropriate skill sets is essential for sustainable growth, particularly during periods of transformation or market uncertainty.

Advisory Board vs. Board of Directors

The difference between a board of directors and an advisory board lies in their respective authority and roles:

Board of Directors:

  • Ultimate decision-making power within the organisation
  • Includes executive directors and non-executive directors
  • Legally responsible for company performance and compliance
  • Reports to shareholders and regulatory bodies
  • Bound by fiduciary duties and corporate governance codes

Advisory Board:

  • Provides advice and guidance to the board of directors
  • No formal decision-making authority or fiduciary duties
  • Offers specialized expertise without legal liability
  • More flexible structure and engagement terms
  • Not subject to the same regulatory oversight

The advisory board and a board are distinct entities with different functions within the corporate governance structure. Many successful organisations use both - a formal board of directors for governance and accountability, and an advisory board for specialized strategic guidance.

For startups and SMEs, advisory boards can provide high-calibre expertise at a lower cost and commitment level than appointing NEDs. However, as companies mature and face increased regulatory requirements, transitioning advisors to formal NED roles may become necessary.

Different Types of Board Members

Board members come in various forms, each contributing uniquely to the organisation’s governance and overall board structure:

1. Executive Directors

  • Full-time employees with operational responsibilities
  • CEO, CFO, COO typically serve as executive directors
  • Responsible for day-to-day management and strategy execution

2. Non-Executive Directors (NEDs)

  • Bring independent oversight and challenge to executive directors
  • Provide strategic guidance based on external perspective
  • Monitor performance and ensure accountability

3. Independent Non-Executive Directors

  • NEDs with no material business relationship with the company
  • Enhance board objectivity and governance quality
  • Particularly important for audit and remuneration committees

4. Board Advisors / Advisory Board Members

  • Offer specialized expertise in specific domains
  • Flexible engagement without fiduciary responsibilities
  • Often industry experts, technical specialists, or market authorities

5. Trustees (for non-profits and charities)

  • Similar responsibilities to NEDs but for not-for-profit organisations
  • Ensure charitable objectives are met
  • Oversee proper use of charitable funds

When looking for non-executive directors, consider the range of perspectives needed for effective decision-making in board meetings. The right mix of board members ensures comprehensive oversight and guidance.

According to research by PwC’s Annual Corporate Directors Survey, the most effective boards combine diverse skills, experiences, and backgrounds to challenge assumptions and drive innovation.

Having different types of board members leads to a well-rounded board composition that can navigate complex strategic, financial, and operational challenges.

The Importance of Board Roles in Startups

How NEDs Contribute to Startup Governance

In the dynamic landscape of startups, the NED role is pivotal for effective corporate governance. As board members, non-executive directors provide independent oversight and strategic guidance to the executive directors and management team, bolstering the organisation’s stability and long-term success.

NEDs contribute to startup governance by:

  1. Providing Independent Oversight: NEDs challenge executive decisions constructively, ensuring strategic choices are thoroughly vetted
  2. Enhancing Credibility: The presence of experienced NEDs signals maturity and governance quality to investors, customers, and partners
  3. Risk Mitigation: NEDs help identify and manage risks that executive teams, focused on growth, might overlook
  4. Investor Confidence: Institutional investors often require NEDs as a condition of investment, viewing them as essential governance safeguards
  5. Strategic Guidance: NEDs bring experience from other organisations, offering valuable perspectives on scaling, market entry, and competitive positioning
  6. Succession Planning: NEDs ensure continuity by overseeing leadership development and succession strategies

Research by Cambridge Associates shows that startups with experienced NEDs are 40% more likely to achieve successful exits and scale sustainably.

NEDs play a crucial role in setting the strategic direction of the startup, particularly during critical phases such as Series A funding, international expansion, or preparing for acquisition or IPO.

The number of directors and their engagement level significantly influences startup success. Most early-stage startups begin with 3-5 board members, expanding as the company grows and governance needs become more complex.

The Value of Advisory Board Members for New Ventures

Advisory board members offer invaluable insights and specialized expertise to new ventures. Unlike the board of directors, members of advisory boards don’t possess the legally responsible fiduciary duties, but their counsel can significantly enhance decision-making.

Advisory board members provide particular value for startups through:

  • Specialized Technical Expertise: Technology advisors guide product development, architecture decisions, and technical hiring
  • Market Entry Guidance: Advisors with regional or industry expertise facilitate market penetration strategies
  • Customer Development: Advisors from target customer segments validate product-market fit
  • Fundraising Support: Former investors or CFOs provide insights into fundraising strategy and investor relations
  • Talent Acquisition: Well-connected advisors facilitate recruitment of key executives and team members
  • Partnership Facilitation: Advisors open doors to strategic partnerships and business development opportunities

This board role is particularly beneficial for startups seeking flexible and targeted guidance without the formal governance structure and cost of appointing NEDs. Many successful startups leverage advisory boards during their early stages, transitioning advisors to formal NED roles as they mature.

According to the Startup Genome Report, startups with active advisory boards are 2.3x more likely to successfully scale internationally and raise follow-on funding.

Having advisors provides additional support for the executive directors, particularly in areas where the founding team lacks experience. This targeted expertise can accelerate growth and help startups avoid costly strategic missteps.

Identifying the Right Board Role for Your Startup

Choosing the right board role is crucial for a startup’s growth trajectory. While non-executive directors offer formal governance and oversight, board advisors bring specialized expertise and flexible support.

Consider appointing NEDs when your startup:

  • Has raised institutional funding (Series A or beyond)
  • Faces complex regulatory or compliance requirements
  • Needs formal governance structures for investor assurance
  • Is preparing for acquisition, merger, or IPO
  • Requires independent oversight of executive performance
  • Has reached a stage where fiduciary duties and accountability are essential

Consider establishing an advisory board when your startup:

  • Is in early stages (pre-seed, seed) with limited resources
  • Needs specialized expertise in specific domains (technology, marketing, international markets)
  • Requires flexible, targeted guidance without formal governance overhead
  • Benefits from a wide network of experts across different areas
  • Wants to test potential NED candidates before formal appointments
  • Seeks mentorship and strategic counsel rather than governance oversight

Assess your startup’s needs and stage of development to determine the optimal type of board member to complement your team. Many successful startups use a hybrid approach:

  1. Early Stage (Pre-Seed, Seed): Advisory board with 3-5 specialized advisors
  2. Growth Stage (Series A-B): Transition to formal board with 2-3 NEDs plus retained advisors in specialized areas
  3. Scale Stage (Series C+): Fully constituted board with majority independent NEDs, specialized committees, and targeted advisors

The number of directors should scale with company complexity, typically ranging from 3-5 members in early stages to 7-9 members for mature, pre-IPO companies.

For personalized guidance on building your board structure, explore our Executive Coaching and Board Advisory services.

Choosing the Right Board Member: Factors to Consider

Criteria for Selecting a Non-Executive Director

Selecting a non-executive director requires careful consideration of several criteria to ensure they add genuine value to your organisation’s governance and strategic direction.

Look for the following qualities when appointing NEDs:

1. Relevant Industry Experience

  • Deep understanding of your sector, competitive dynamics, and market trends
  • Track record of success in similar organisations or comparable growth stages
  • Ability to leverage industry connections for partnerships and business development

2. Proven Governance Expertise

  • Experience serving on other boards with demonstrable impact
  • Strong understanding of fiduciary duties and corporate governance principles
  • Familiarity with the UK Corporate Governance Code and regulatory requirements

3. Financial Acumen

  • Ability to interpret financial statements and key performance metrics
  • Experience with financial oversight, audit, and risk management
  • Understanding of valuation, capital structure, and fundraising

4. Independence and Objectivity

  • No conflicts of interest or material relationships with the company
  • Willingness to challenge executive decisions constructively
  • Impartial perspective that prioritizes shareholder and stakeholder interests

5. Cultural Fit and Values Alignment

  • Alignment with company mission, vision, and core values
  • Collaborative working style that complements existing board dynamics
  • Commitment to diversity, inclusion, and ethical business practices

6. Time Commitment and Availability

  • Sufficient time to fulfill NED responsibilities (typically 20-30 days/year)
  • Willingness to attend board meetings, serve on committees, and engage between meetings
  • Availability during critical strategic moments or crisis situations

Research by Spencer Stuart indicates that the most effective NEDs combine deep functional expertise (finance, technology, international markets) with broad strategic thinking and strong interpersonal skills.

Ensure they are familiar with the UK Corporate Governance Code if you’re a listed company or preparing for IPO. Even for private companies, adherence to governance best practices is increasingly expected by investors and stakeholders.

Looking for non-executive directors should also focus on ensuring a good cultural fit within the board composition. A NED who aligns with your organisation’s values and working style will be far more effective than one with impressive credentials but poor cultural alignment.

What to Look for in a Board Advisor

When seeking a board advisor, prioritize expertise and experience in areas critical to your organisation’s success and growth objectives.

Key criteria for selecting board advisors:

1. Specialized Domain Expertise

  • Deep knowledge in specific areas where your team has gaps (technology, marketing, international expansion, regulatory compliance)
  • Proven track record of solving challenges similar to those your organisation faces
  • Up-to-date expertise in rapidly evolving fields

2. Strategic Network and Connections

  • Access to potential customers, partners, investors, or talent
  • Ability to open doors and facilitate introductions that accelerate growth
  • Influence within relevant industry or professional communities

3. Practical, Actionable Guidance

  • Ability to translate strategic advice into concrete action steps
  • Hands-on approach to problem-solving rather than purely theoretical advice
  • Willingness to engage beyond formal meetings when critical issues arise

4. Communication and Mentoring Skills

  • Ability to communicate complex concepts clearly to diverse audiences
  • Willingness to mentor executive team members and share knowledge generously
  • Collaborative approach that empowers your team rather than directing them

5. Availability and Engagement

  • Realistic time commitment that aligns with your needs (typically 5-15 days/year)
  • Responsiveness to urgent questions or strategic challenges
  • Proactive engagement rather than passive participation

Unlike board members on the formal board, advisory board members offer specialized insights, so assess their specific skills and how they align with your company’s goals and strategic priorities.

When you are looking for non-executive directors, remember advisors do not have the same liability as non-executive directors. This makes advisory roles attractive for high-calibre professionals who want to contribute without taking on full fiduciary responsibilities.

Many successful executives, entrepreneurs, and industry experts serve on multiple advisory boards, sharing their expertise while maintaining flexibility in their commitments.

Assessing Compatibility with Company Goals

Ensuring compatibility with company goals is paramount when choosing any board member, whether NED or advisor. The best credentials and experience mean little if there’s misalignment with your strategic vision and organisational culture.

Assess compatibility through the following framework:

1. Strategic Alignment

  • Does the candidate understand and support your company’s long-term vision?
  • Do they have relevant experience with your strategic priorities (growth, profitability, exit, international expansion)?
  • Can they contribute meaningfully to the specific challenges you’re facing?

2. Values and Culture Fit

  • Do they embody the values you want reflected in your board?
  • Is their working style compatible with your executive team and existing board members?
  • Do they demonstrate commitment to diversity, inclusion, and ethical governance?

3. Stage-Appropriate Expertise

  • Does their experience align with your company’s current stage (startup, growth, scale, maturity)?
  • Have they successfully navigated transitions similar to those you’re approaching?
  • Do they understand the unique challenges of your business model and market?

4. Geographic and Market Relevance

  • For international expansion, do they have relevant regional expertise?
  • Do they understand the regulatory environment in your target markets?
  • Can they navigate cultural nuances in your customer segments?

Before making board appointments, conduct thorough interviews and reference checks to ensure they are the right fit for your team, especially for positions on the main board of directors.

Best practices for evaluating board candidates:

  • Conduct multiple interviews with different stakeholders (CEO, existing board members, key executives)
  • Request references from previous board colleagues and professional associates
  • Consider a trial period or project-based engagement before formal appointment
  • Assess their questions and observations during due diligence - do they demonstrate genuine curiosity and insight?
  • Evaluate their feedback style - is it constructive, actionable, and delivered with respect?

Having a diverse board composition brings various backgrounds and different perspectives to the members of an advisory board or company board. Research by McKinsey consistently shows that diverse boards outperform homogeneous ones across multiple performance metrics.

Diversity encompasses not just demographic factors (gender, ethnicity, age) but also cognitive diversity (different thinking styles, professional backgrounds, industry experiences). The most effective boards combine complementary perspectives that challenge assumptions and drive innovation.

For expert guidance on building your board and developing leadership capabilities, explore our Executive Coaching and Board Advisory services.

Making the Right Choice for Your Organisation

Choosing between a Board Advisor and a Non-Executive Director depends on your organisation’s stage, governance needs, and strategic priorities. Both roles offer tremendous value when aligned with your specific circumstances.

Key takeaways for making your decision:

  • NEDs provide formal governance, accountability, and oversight - essential for companies with investor backing, regulatory requirements, or preparing for major transitions
  • Board Advisors offer flexible, specialized expertise - ideal for early-stage companies or organisations needing targeted guidance without formal governance overhead
  • Many successful organisations use both - a formal board for governance with advisors providing specialized domain expertise
  • The right choice evolves with your organisation - what works at seed stage differs from Series B or pre-IPO requirements

Ultimately, building an effective board structure requires thoughtful consideration of your unique needs, careful candidate selection, and ongoing evaluation of board effectiveness.


Key Takeaways

  • Non-Executive Directors (NEDs) are formal board members with fiduciary duties, legal liabilities, and voting rights on strategic decisions, while Board Advisors provide specialized guidance without formal governance responsibilities
  • The company board of directors holds ultimate decision-making authority, whereas advisory boards offer recommendations and expertise without binding authority or regulatory oversight
  • Startups benefit from NEDs for governance and investor confidence, particularly after institutional funding, while advisory boards provide flexible, cost-effective expertise during early growth stages
  • Selection criteria differ significantly - NEDs require governance expertise, independence, and formal time commitments, while advisors are chosen for specialized domain knowledge and flexible engagement

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between a Board Advisor and a Non-Executive Director?

The main difference is legal status and responsibility. Non-Executive Directors (NEDs) are formal board members with fiduciary duties, legal liabilities, and voting rights on company decisions. They are registered at Companies House and subject to corporate governance codes. Board Advisors provide expert guidance and recommendations without fiduciary duties, legal liabilities, or voting rights. Advisors operate outside the formal board structure, offering specialized expertise on a more flexible basis.

Can a Board Advisor become a Non-Executive Director later?

Yes, this is a common progression. Many organisations use advisory board positions as a trial period before making formal NED appointments. This allows both the organisation and the advisor to assess compatibility, value contribution, and cultural fit before committing to a formal directorship with its attendant legal responsibilities and time commitments. Successful advisors who demonstrate significant value often transition to NED roles as the company matures.

Generally, Board Advisors have minimal legal liability compared to NEDs. Advisors typically operate under consulting agreements that limit their exposure, and they don’t have the fiduciary duties that create legal obligations for formal directors. However, advisors should still be cautious about the advice they provide, as they could theoretically face liability for gross negligence or fraudulent misrepresentation. Professional indemnity insurance is advisable for active advisors.

How much time commitment is expected from NEDs vs. Board Advisors?

Non-Executive Directors typically commit 20-30 days per year, including board meetings (usually 8-12 annually), committee work, preparation time, and strategic engagements. Some NEDs of larger organisations commit 40+ days annually. Board Advisors have more flexible arrangements, typically committing 5-15 days per year with as-needed availability for specific issues. Advisory engagements can be structured monthly, quarterly, or on a project basis depending on organisational needs.

What compensation structure is typical for NEDs and Board Advisors?

Non-Executive Directors are typically compensated with director’s fees (ranging from £20,000-£100,000+ annually depending on company size and complexity), often supplemented with equity or share options. Additional fees may apply for committee chair roles. Board Advisors have more varied compensation structures, including consulting fees (daily or monthly rates), equity grants, or a combination. Startup advisors often work for equity only (typically 0.25%-1% vesting over 2-4 years), while advisors to established companies command consulting fees similar to their professional rates.

When should a startup appoint its first Non-Executive Director?

Most startups should appoint their first NED around Series A funding (£2-5 million raised), when investor governance requirements typically mandate independent board oversight. Earlier appointment may be beneficial if the startup faces complex regulatory requirements, is in a highly specialized industry, or has founders with limited commercial experience. Before Series A, advisory boards usually provide sufficient strategic guidance without the formal governance overhead and cost of NEDs.


Further Reading and Resources

For personalized guidance on building your board structure or developing board-ready leadership capabilities, contact us to discuss how we can support your governance journey.

Key Takeaways

  • Non-Executive Directors (NEDs) are formal board members with fiduciary duties, legal liabilities, and voting rights on strategic decisions, while Board Advisors provide specialized guidance without formal governance responsibilities
  • The company board of directors holds ultimate decision-making authority, whereas advisory boards offer recommendations and expertise without binding authority or regulatory oversight
  • Startups benefit from NEDs for governance and investor confidence, particularly after institutional funding, while advisory boards provide flexible, cost-effective expertise during early growth stages
  • Selection criteria differ significantly - NEDs require governance expertise, independence, and formal time commitments, while advisors are chosen for specialized domain knowledge and flexible engagement

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1. What is the main difference between a Board Advisor and a Non-Executive Director?

The main difference is legal status and responsibility. Non-Executive Directors (NEDs) are formal board members with fiduciary duties, legal liabilities, and voting rights on company decisions. They are registered at Companies House and subject to corporate governance codes. Board Advisors provide expert guidance and recommendations without fiduciary duties, legal liabilities, or voting rights. Advisors operate outside the formal board structure, offering specialized expertise on a more flexible basis.

Q2. Can a Board Advisor become a Non-Executive Director later?

Yes, this is a common progression. Many organisations use advisory board positions as a trial period before making formal NED appointments. This allows both the organisation and the advisor to assess compatibility, value contribution, and cultural fit before committing to a formal directorship with its attendant legal responsibilities and time commitments. Successful advisors who demonstrate significant value often transition to NED roles as the company matures.

Q3. Do Board Advisors have any legal liability?

Generally, Board Advisors have minimal legal liability compared to NEDs. Advisors typically operate under consulting agreements that limit their exposure, and they don't have the fiduciary duties that create legal obligations for formal directors. However, advisors should still be cautious about the advice they provide, as they could theoretically face liability for gross negligence or fraudulent misrepresentation. Professional indemnity insurance is advisable for active advisors.

Q4. How much time commitment is expected from NEDs vs. Board Advisors?

Non-Executive Directors typically commit 20-30 days per year, including board meetings (usually 8-12 annually), committee work, preparation time, and strategic engagements. Some NEDs of larger organisations commit 40+ days annually. Board Advisors have more flexible arrangements, typically committing 5-15 days per year with as-needed availability for specific issues. Advisory engagements can be structured monthly, quarterly, or on a project basis depending on organisational needs.

Q5. What compensation structure is typical for NEDs and Board Advisors?

Non-Executive Directors are typically compensated with director's fees (ranging from £20,000-£100,000+ annually depending on company size and complexity), often supplemented with equity or share options. Additional fees may apply for committee chair roles. Board Advisors have more varied compensation structures, including consulting fees (daily or monthly rates), equity grants, or a combination. Startup advisors often work for equity only (typically 0.25%-1% vesting over 2-4 years), while advisors to established companies command consulting fees similar to their professional rates.

Q6. When should a startup appoint its first Non-Executive Director?

Most startups should appoint their first NED around Series A funding (£2-5 million raised), when investor governance requirements typically mandate independent board oversight. Earlier appointment may be beneficial if the startup faces complex regulatory requirements, is in a highly specialized industry, or has founders with limited commercial experience. Before Series A, advisory boards usually provide sufficient strategic guidance without the formal governance overhead and cost of NEDs.

About the Author

Craig Fearn

FRSPH, FCMI, IoD Ambassador

Craig Fearn is an executive coach and board advisor with extensive director-level experience. As an IoD Ambassador, FRSPH Fellow, and FCMI Fellow, he works with C-suite leaders and boards across sectors including NHS, technology, financial services, and professional services. Craig combines deep psychological insight with practical board-level experience to deliver measurable leadership development outcomes.

Learn more about Craig →

Ready to Transform Your Leadership?

Explore how board-level executive coaching can accelerate your development and create lasting impact within your organization.